Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 52F17196.6030702@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 02/04/2014 05:47 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: >> On 02/04/2014 03:08 PM, Jeff Janes wrote: >>> Having an AMI would help, but even with an AMI in place, MinGW is >>> still insanely slow. Running "make" on already made PostgreSQL (so >>> there was nothing to actually do) takes 1.5 minutes. And a make after >>> a "make clean" takes half an hour. This is on an actual desktop, not >>> an AWS micro instance. So doing a git bisect is just painful. Is the >>> MSVC build faster? >> Would have to check with the same build options (cassert and debug have >> major timing effects.) I agree it's not lightning fast like "make -j 4" >> on a decent linux box. > I wonder if ccache exists for Mingw. That thing makes a huge difference > in the perceived build speed ... > > Indeed. But it's not really, AFAIK. Certainly it's not in the list of packages known to mingw-get on the machine i checked on (jacana). cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: