Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 52F1535A.5090300@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 02/04/2014 03:08 PM, Jeff Janes wrote: > > > Do you know about what it would cost? Could official community funds > be used for it (it seems like something that is cheap, but which you > wouldn't want to be forgotten about some month.) > > Having an AMI would help, but even with an AMI in place, MinGW is > still insanely slow. Running "make" on already made PostgreSQL (so > there was nothing to actually do) takes 1.5 minutes. And a make after > a "make clean" takes half an hour. This is on an actual desktop, not > an AWS micro instance. So doing a git bisect is just painful. Is the > MSVC build faster? > > Would have to check with the same build options (cassert and debug have major timing effects.) I agree it's not lightning fast like "make -j 4" on a decent linux box. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: