Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 24328.1115310025@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes: > On Thu, 5 May 2005, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> Can you have the same tags across different modules in the same CVS >> server? If so, that would work. > I believe that I can made a 'meta module' that, if I checked it out, would > include all sub-modules, and that I can tag/branch appropriately ... if > not, its just a matter of looping through each at the same time, a little > more work, but not much more ... Probably not worth the trouble compared to just putting them as separate top-level directories in the checkout tree. Our last experiment with multiple modules didn't go very well. One thought here --- would we also separate out the documentation for them? That would have some negative effects (make the documentation less seamless) but I'm not sure we'd have any choice. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: