Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
От | Marc G. Fournier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20050505135931.M42300@ganymede.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 5 May 2005, Tom Lane wrote: > "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes: >> On Thu, 5 May 2005, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >>> Can you have the same tags across different modules in the same CVS >>> server? If so, that would work. > >> I believe that I can made a 'meta module' that, if I checked it out, would >> include all sub-modules, and that I can tag/branch appropriately ... if >> not, its just a matter of looping through each at the same time, a little >> more work, but not much more ... > > Probably not worth the trouble compared to just putting them as > separate top-level directories in the checkout tree. Our last > experiment with multiple modules didn't go very well. Actually, this is what I was planning ... each 'separate top-level directories' is classified as a seperate module ... it is those 'separate top-level directories' that I believe I can setup a "virtual meta module" for for purposes of tagging/branching ... it wouldn't be something anyone but I would ever look at ... > One thought here --- would we also separate out the documentation for > them? That would have some negative effects (make the documentation > less seamless) but I'm not sure we'd have any choice. I'd *love* to see a centralized docs module created ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: