Re: [PATCH] pg_isready (was: [WIP] pg_ping utility)
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] pg_isready (was: [WIP] pg_ping utility) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20130205140642.GA5753@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] pg_isready (was: [WIP] pg_ping utility) (Phil Sorber <phil@omniti.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] pg_isready (was: [WIP] pg_ping utility)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Phil Sorber escribió: > On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 6:41 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Phil Sorber <phil@omniti.com> wrote: > >> OK, here is the patch that handles the connection string in dbname. > >> I'll post the other patch under a different posting because I am sure > >> it will get plenty of debate on it's own. > > > > I'm sorry, can you remind me what this does for us vs. the existing coding? > > > > It's supposed to handle the connection string passed as dbname case to > be able to get the right output for host:port. Surely the idea is that you can also give it a postgres:// URI, right? -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: