Re: [PATCH] pg_isready (was: [WIP] pg_ping utility)
От | Phil Sorber |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] pg_isready (was: [WIP] pg_ping utility) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CADAkt-g6mp9DhWv0fPP1U499D3fMThD8L=eO=6d089ngjGLTyQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] pg_isready (was: [WIP] pg_ping utility) (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] pg_isready (was: [WIP] pg_ping utility)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Phil Sorber escribió: >> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 6:41 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Phil Sorber <phil@omniti.com> wrote: >> >> OK, here is the patch that handles the connection string in dbname. >> >> I'll post the other patch under a different posting because I am sure >> >> it will get plenty of debate on it's own. >> > >> > I'm sorry, can you remind me what this does for us vs. the existing coding? >> > >> >> It's supposed to handle the connection string passed as dbname case to >> be able to get the right output for host:port. > > Surely the idea is that you can also give it a postgres:// URI, right? Absolutely. > > -- > Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ > PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: