Re: [PATCH] pg_isready (was: [WIP] pg_ping utility)
От | Phil Sorber |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] pg_isready (was: [WIP] pg_ping utility) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CADAkt-j1CwmmnTiBN+EfdJrn1sWJBo6TtW8dU-7MV6X7pbH3Zw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] pg_isready (was: [WIP] pg_ping utility) (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] pg_isready (was: [WIP] pg_ping utility)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 6:41 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Phil Sorber <phil@omniti.com> wrote: >> OK, here is the patch that handles the connection string in dbname. >> I'll post the other patch under a different posting because I am sure >> it will get plenty of debate on it's own. > > I'm sorry, can you remind me what this does for us vs. the existing coding? > It's supposed to handle the connection string passed as dbname case to be able to get the right output for host:port. It works, but I don't really like it all that much, honestly. I also submitted a patch to add on to libpq to handle this, but Alvaro posed some questions I don't have good answers for. So I actually have another patch brewing that I actually like, but I need to put the finishing touches on. I plan on submitting that later this morning. > -- > Robert Haas > EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com > The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: