Re: Any reason to have heap_(de)formtuple?
От | Zdenek Kotala |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Any reason to have heap_(de)formtuple? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4900956C.7020704@sun.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Any reason to have heap_(de)formtuple? (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Any reason to have heap_(de)formtuple?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera napsal(a): > Zdenek Kotala wrote: >> Tom Lane napsal(a): > >>> Well, aside from the gruntwork needed to convert all the core code that >>> still uses the old APIs, there's the prospect of breaking extension >>> modules that still use the old APIs. It's kind of annoying to have two >>> copies of that code, but less annoying than removing it would be ... >> What's about convert null array to boolean and call heap_form_tuple? > > Agreed, I started doing that some time ago ... it doesn't seem all that > complicated. Do you have any half patch? > We could try to add a #warning if an external module uses > the deprecated interface, for a couple of releases, and then perhaps > drop it. +1 Zdenek -- Zdenek Kotala Sun Microsystems Prague, Czech Republic http://sun.com/postgresql
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: