Re: {**Spam**} Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan
| От | Dimitri Fontaine |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: {**Spam**} Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200802072029.51468.dfontaine@hi-media.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: {**Spam**} Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Le Thursday 07 February 2008 17:19:26 Tom Lane, vous avez écrit : > > Not having looked into exactly how it works and if it's something we > > want, but if we want to, any reason we can't just point it at the svn > > mirror? > > Synchronization problems scare me. AIUI we're talking about one way synchronization (from CVS to SVN) only, and that's considering review-board is not able to do CVS directly (which seems wrong). The quick doc reading I've made showed a read-only tool at the SCM side --- the accepted patch won't get commited for you by the tool. > The point I tried to make earlier was that if we actually started to > rely on such a tool, we'd want to fix it to talk to CVS. Others are pointing it does in fact talk to CVS even if the documentation about this is... to be written. Regards, -- dim
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: