Re: {**Spam**} Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan

Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Le Thursday 07 February 2008 17:19:26 Tom Lane, vous avez écrit :
>>> Not having looked into exactly how it works and if it's something we
>>> want, but if we want to, any reason we can't just point it at the svn
>>> mirror?
>> Synchronization problems scare me.
> 
> AIUI we're talking about one way synchronization (from CVS to SVN) only, and 
> that's considering review-board is not able to do CVS directly (which seems 
> wrong). 

yes - CVS works just fine

> The quick doc reading I've made showed a read-only tool at the SCM side --- 
> the accepted patch won't get commited for you by the tool.

this seems to be true too from what I see on the test-install

> 
>> The point I tried to make earlier was that if we actually started to
>> rely on such a tool, we'd want to fix it to talk to CVS.  
> 
> Others are pointing it does in fact talk to CVS even if the documentation 
> about this is... to be written.

well CVS is a simply as selecting "CVS" in the admin interface and seems 
to be the only scm that it works without installing additional python 
libraries :-)


Stefan