Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4870.1202401166@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan
Re: {**Spam**} Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: > On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 06:50:34PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> Hmm, the info on that last page might be out of date, but what it says is >> that the only SCMS they really support 100% is SVN. The other ones they >> claim support for don't work [well/at all] with the post-review tool. > Not having looked into exactly how it works and if it's something we want, > but if we want to, any reason we can't just point it at the svn mirror? Synchronization problems scare me. The point I tried to make earlier was that if we actually started to rely on such a tool, we'd want to fix it to talk to CVS. Hey, it's an open source project, right? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: