Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200404220312.i3M3C8D11648@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > There are only a few PostgreSQL developers who can do it, so what are > > the odds that a single guy who maintains a plugin is going to be able to > > do it. And you can say it is easy, but it just takes one complex > > problem to hit you, and with PostgreSQL, and all the shared lib stuff > > and dynamic loading, lots of it is complex. > > So, put together a developers kit ... you'd need, what, a half dozen files > to bootstrap a project with? configure.in, Makefile.in, a README file > with the basics on what needs to be modified in Makefile.in, the > src/template directory ... > > If you are looking for a problem to solve, make it easier for developers > to setup a proper build environment, don't punish end-users to giving them > a bigger package to download Download (100% reliable to fix problem) vs. my time to build kit --- I pick download. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: