Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions
От | Marc G. Fournier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20040421234728.V32445@ganymede.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote: > There are only a few PostgreSQL developers who can do it, so what are > the odds that a single guy who maintains a plugin is going to be able to > do it. And you can say it is easy, but it just takes one complex > problem to hit you, and with PostgreSQL, and all the shared lib stuff > and dynamic loading, lots of it is complex. So, put together a developers kit ... you'd need, what, a half dozen files to bootstrap a project with? configure.in, Makefile.in, a README file with the basics on what needs to be modified in Makefile.in, the src/template directory ... If you are looking for a problem to solve, make it easier for developers to setup a proper build environment, don't punish end-users to giving them a bigger package to download ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: