Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions
От | Marc G. Fournier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20040422210643.C32445@ganymede.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > There are only a few PostgreSQL developers who can do it, so what are > > > the odds that a single guy who maintains a plugin is going to be able to > > > do it. And you can say it is easy, but it just takes one complex > > > problem to hit you, and with PostgreSQL, and all the shared lib stuff > > > and dynamic loading, lots of it is complex. > > > > So, put together a developers kit ... you'd need, what, a half dozen files > > to bootstrap a project with? configure.in, Makefile.in, a README file > > with the basics on what needs to be modified in Makefile.in, the > > src/template directory ... > > > > If you are looking for a problem to solve, make it easier for developers > > to setup a proper build environment, don't punish end-users to giving them > > a bigger package to download > > Download (100% reliable to fix problem) vs. my time to build kit --- I > pick download. Right, but you don't count ... you aren't an end-user ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: