Re: Multiple backends on a single physical database
От | Chris Miles |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Multiple backends on a single physical database |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20021012161939.K6712@psychofx.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Multiple backends on a single physical database (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Multiple backends on a single physical database
Re: Multiple backends on a single physical database |
Список | pgsql-admin |
On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 11:11:53AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Good question. It is my understanding that fsync, locking, and the > order of writes is not guaranteed in NFS like it is for local file > systems. I question how well it would handle any of the failure modes > that local file systems can withstand. Good point. Perhaps that depends on the NFS client and server combination also? I know that Netapp worked with Oracle and both companies guarantee and recommend a Sun/Netapp Oracle over NFS solution (which I have setup in a previous life) and such a solution works very well. Nobody is going to make such a guarantee with postgresql (are they?) so consider us a case study for such a setup. So far, so good, even under heavy load testing. If anybody has any horror stories with postgresql over NFS, please share them. Cheers, Chris.
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: