Re: Multiple backends on a single physical database
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Multiple backends on a single physical database |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200210121511.g9CFBs619940@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Multiple backends on a single physical database (Chris Miles <chris_pg002@psychofx.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Multiple backends on a single physical database
Re: Multiple backends on a single physical database |
Список | pgsql-admin |
Chris Miles wrote: > On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 10:09:55AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > We also don't recommend NFS directories because the NFS file behavior is > > not 100% the same as a local file system. > > Can you comment on what the incompatabities are? (related to PostgreSQL > only). > > We currently run PostgreSQL on Linux servers with the data on dedicated > Netapp filers over NFS. We have had no problems so far and performance > is very acceptable. > > If there is something I need to watch out for, I would like to know. Good question. It is my understanding that fsync, locking, and the order of writes is not guaranteed in NFS like it is for local file systems. I question how well it would handle any of the failure modes that local file systems can withstand. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: