Re: Multiple backends on a single physical database
От | Chad R. Larson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Multiple backends on a single physical database |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4.2.2.20021013231029.00aecef0@smtp.eldocomp.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Multiple backends on a single physical database (Chris Miles <chris_pg002@psychofx.com>) |
Список | pgsql-admin |
At 04:19 PM 10/12/02 +0100, Chris Miles wrote: >If anybody has any horror stories with postgresql over NFS, please share >them. I have no horror stories, as we aren't doing such a thing. But it might be in our future. I think the version of the NFS protocol you can use is =very= important. For example, regarding file locking: V1 didn't do it at all (every transaction was supposed to be stateless, which means persistent requests were just an error. In V2, support for locking was defined, but many implementations always returned successful and didn't actually do anything. I believe that V3 gets locking right, but I don't know about fsync. You're gonna have to test your environment... -crl -- Chad R. Larson (CRL22) chad@eldocomp.com Eldorado Computing, Inc. 602-604-3100 5353 North 16th Street, Suite 400 Phoenix, Arizona 85016-3228
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: