Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess seems a tad confused

>    > 1. Why did the new pgaccess get installed into REL6_5 branch but not
>    > main development branch?
>    > 
> 
>    No sense putting in development because there will probably be a newer
>    version by the time 6.6 is released, no?
> 
> Yes there will be, but it seems to serve two purposes.  One is that
> anyone working with the development tree at least has some version of
> pgaccess handy.  More importantly, though, any bugs in the Makefile or
> whatever will be noticed early by developers and won't wait until the
> last moment.  Since the basic installation scheme likely doesn't
> depend much on the exact pgaccess release, there really isn't much to
> be lost by keeping it in the development tree.

It is in the development tree, just not the most recent version.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026