Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess seems a tad confused
От | Brook Milligan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess seems a tad confused |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199909171548.JAA22349@biology.nmsu.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess seems a tad confused (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess seems a tad confused
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> 1. Why did the new pgaccess get installed into REL6_5 branch but not > main development branch? > No sense putting in development because there will probably be a newer version by the time 6.6 is released, no? Yes there will be, but it seems to serve two purposes. One is that anyone working with the development tree at least has some version of pgaccess handy. More importantly, though, any bugs in the Makefile or whatever will be noticed early by developers and won't wait until the last moment. Since the basic installation scheme likely doesn't depend much on the exact pgaccess release, there really isn't much to be lost by keeping it in the development tree. Cheers, Brook
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: