Обсуждение: Re: 'CVS-Unknown' buildfarm failures?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of
> Andrew Dunstan
> Sent: 02 June 2006 03:31
> To: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 'CVS-Unknown' buildfarm failures?
>
> cvs-unknown means there are unknown files in the repo:
>
> my $unknown_files = grep {/^\?/ } @cvslog;
> ...
> send_result('CVS-Unknown',$unknown_files,\@cvslog)
> if ($unknown_files);
>
> This is almost always a case of operator error. buildfarm
> only ever builds
> in a copy of the repo, not in the permanent repo itself, so
> there should
> NEVER be any file there which does not come from CVS. I have
> repeatedly
> advised buildfarm member owners not to build by hand in the
> buildfarm repos.
> Not everybody listens, apparently.
The owner of snake can guarantee that that is not the case - that box is
not used for *anything* other than the buildfarm and hasn't even been
logged into for weeks, if not months.
The failures come and go, so I have to suspect something other than
operator error.
Regards, Dave
Dave Page said: >> I have >> repeatedly >> advised buildfarm member owners not to build by hand in the >> buildfarm repos. >> Not everybody listens, apparently. > > The owner of snake can guarantee that that is not the case - that box > is not used for *anything* other than the buildfarm and hasn't even > been logged into for weeks, if not months. > > The failures come and go, so I have to suspect something other than > operator error. > That's why I said "almost always" :-) I strongly suspect that snake is hitting the "file/directory doesn't disappear immediately when you unlink/rmdir" problem on Windows that we have had to code around inside Postgres. It looks like cvs is trying to prune an empty directory but isn't fast enough. I assume that snake just uses the Msys DTK's cvs? If so, I think we'll just have to live with this - it's not very frequent - snake's last occurrence on HEAD was 62 days ago. cheers andrew
"Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> I strongly suspect that snake is hitting the "file/directory doesn't
> disappear immediately when you unlink/rmdir" problem on Windows that we have
> had to code around inside Postgres. It looks like cvs is trying to prune an
> empty directory but isn't fast enough.
Maybe "sleep 2" or so between "make distclean" and "cvs update" in the
script would help?
regards, tom lane
Tom Lane wrote: > "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > >> I strongly suspect that snake is hitting the "file/directory doesn't >> disappear immediately when you unlink/rmdir" problem on Windows that we have >> had to code around inside Postgres. It looks like cvs is trying to prune an >> empty directory but isn't fast enough. >> > > Maybe "sleep 2" or so between "make distclean" and "cvs update" in the > script would help? > > > buildfarm never does make distclean. It operates on a copy which it removes at the end of the run. What's happening here is that cvs actually creates the directory and then later prunes it when it finds it is empty. Run strace on "cvs update" and then look for pg-config, or examine src/bin/CVS/Entries.Log and you should see what's going on. So we'd have to put the sleep inside cvs ... cheers andrew
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> What's happening here is that cvs actually creates the directory and
> then later prunes it when it finds it is empty.
I find that explanation pretty unconvincing. Why would cvs print a "?"
for such a directory?
regards, tom lane
Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > >> What's happening here is that cvs actually creates the directory and >> then later prunes it when it finds it is empty. >> > > I find that explanation pretty unconvincing. Why would cvs print a "?" > for such a directory? > > > Another possibility is that the directory is an artifact left from a previous run of cvs update in which the rmdir failed, and the present run prints out the "?" line and subsequently prunes the directory as we have told it to do with the -P flag. I don't have time to dig deeply into the CVS sources to debug the problem comprehensively. cheers andrew
Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: >> What's happening here is that cvs actually creates the directory and >> then later prunes it when it finds it is empty. > > I find that explanation pretty unconvincing. Why would cvs print a "?" > for such a directory? cvs will print a ? if it doesn't know what it is... or is that svn? Joshua D. Drake > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings > -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutionssince 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>>> What's happening here is that cvs actually creates the directory and
>>> then later prunes it when it finds it is empty.
>>
>> I find that explanation pretty unconvincing. Why would cvs print a "?"
>> for such a directory?
> cvs will print a ? if it doesn't know what it is... or is that svn?
But cvs certainly knows "what it is" if it's a subdirectory subject to
creation and pruning; that means the subdirectory exists in the
repository.
I doubt that cvs would complain about a pre-existing subdirectory of
this type either, because that would result in an unreasonable amount of
chatter when adding or removing the -P option.
regards, tom lane
Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: >>> What's happening here is that cvs actually creates the directory and >>> then later prunes it when it finds it is empty. >> >> I find that explanation pretty unconvincing. Why would cvs print a "?" >> for such a directory? > > cvs will print a ? if it doesn't know what it is... or is that svn? > yes, it's a file/directory it doesn't know about. At one stage I suppressed these checks, but I found that too many times we saw errors due to unclean repos. So now buildfarm insists on having a clean repo. I suppose I could provide a switch to turn it off ... in one recent case the repo was genuinely not clean, though, so I am not terribly keen on that approach - but I am open to persuasion. cheers andrew
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> I suppose I could provide a switch to turn it off ... in one recent case
> the repo was genuinely not clean, though, so I am not terribly keen on
> that approach - but I am open to persuasion.
No, I agree it's a good check. Just wondering if we can reduce the
number of false positives. The recent meerkat failures, for instance,
were *not* false positives.
Looking at the snake failures of this type on HEAD, I do see that the
complaints are all about subdirectories that should have been pruned,
which makes Andrew's theory seem plausible. Maybe we should file this
behavior as a cvs bug.
Sudden thought: is there any particularly good reason to use the cvs
update -P switch in buildfarm repositories? If we simply eliminated
the create/prune thrashing for these directories, it'd fix the problem,
if Andrew's idea is correct. Probably save a few cycles too. And since
people are really not supposed to be using these checkouts for anything
else, they don't need to be pretty.
regards, tom lane
Tom Lane wrote: > Sudden thought: is there any particularly good reason to use the cvs > update -P switch in buildfarm repositories? If we simply eliminated > the create/prune thrashing for these directories, it'd fix the problem, > if Andrew's idea is correct. Probably save a few cycles too. And since > people are really not supposed to be using these checkouts for anything > else, they don't need to be pretty. > Good point. I'll do that, since it's pretty close to cost-free. There will be a new release of buildfarm client code, with this and the error name change, in the next day or so. cheers andrew
On Jun 2, 2006, at 10:27 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > Joshua D. Drake wrote: >> Tom Lane wrote: >>> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: >>>> What's happening here is that cvs actually creates the directory >>>> and then later prunes it when it finds it is empty. >>> >>> I find that explanation pretty unconvincing. Why would cvs print >>> a "?" >>> for such a directory? >> >> cvs will print a ? if it doesn't know what it is... or is that svn? >> > > yes, it's a file/directory it doesn't know about. > > At one stage I suppressed these checks, but I found that too many > times we saw errors due to unclean repos. So now buildfarm insists > on having a clean repo. > > I suppose I could provide a switch to turn it off ... in one recent > case the repo was genuinely not clean, though, so I am not terribly > keen on that approach - but I am open to persuasion. Another option would be to re-run cvs up one more time if we get any unexpected files. It sounds like that would fix this issue on windows machines, while still ensuring we had a clean repo to work from.
Jim Nasby wrote: >>> >> >> yes, it's a file/directory it doesn't know about. >> >> At one stage I suppressed these checks, but I found that too many >> times we saw errors due to unclean repos. So now buildfarm insists >> on having a clean repo. >> >> I suppose I could provide a switch to turn it off ... in one recent >> case the repo was genuinely not clean, though, so I am not terribly >> keen on that approach - but I am open to persuasion. > > > Another option would be to re-run cvs up one more time if we get any > unexpected files. It sounds like that would fix this issue on windows > machines, while still ensuring we had a clean repo to work from. > please see the new release of the buildfarm client, in which I have followed Tom's suggestion of removing the -P flag from the checkout and update commands - that should solve the Windows problem, as it will no longer try to remove the directory. I hope that solves the problem - if not I'll have a look at other solutions. cheers andrew
I said: >> >> Another option would be to re-run cvs up one more time if we get any >> unexpected files. It sounds like that would fix this issue on windows >> machines, while still ensuring we had a clean repo to work from. >> > > please see the new release of the buildfarm client, in which I have > followed Tom's suggestion of removing the -P flag from the checkout and > update commands - that should solve the Windows problem, as it will no > longer try to remove the directory. I hope that solves the problem - > if not I'll have a look at other solutions. > Unfortunately, this fell over first time out: http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=loris&dt=2006-06-04%2012:09:33 The fix handled directories, but we got a false positive from a rename not being immediate either, it seems. Bloody Windows! One thought I had was to force Windows to use CVS export rather than update. This has 2 disadvantages: it requires a complete repo fetch every run, even if we don't need to do anything because nothing has changed, and it also means we can't report the version numbers on files changed. Example: http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=loris&dt=2006-06-04%2012:21:43 So what I'm going to try instead is a variation on Jim's suggestion above, but instead of re-running cvs update, what we'll do is a longish sleep (say 10 or 20 secs) which should be enough time for Windows to get its act together, and then run cvs status, which will also show us extraneous files. thoughts? cheers andrew
"Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>>> Another option would be to re-run cvs up one more time if we get any
>>> unexpected files. It sounds like that would fix this issue on windows
>>> machines, while still ensuring we had a clean repo to work from.
> So what I'm going to try instead is a variation on Jim's suggestion above,
> but instead of re-running cvs update, what we'll do is a longish sleep (say
> 10 or 20 secs) which should be enough time for Windows to get its act
> together, and then run cvs status, which will also show us extraneous files.
Yeah, this is probably OK since you only need to do it if you see any ?
entries in the cvs update. Another low-tech solution is to sleep a bit
and then see if any of the files/directories listed in ? entries are
still there.
regards, tom lane
"Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > One thought I had was to force Windows to use CVS export rather than update. > This has 2 disadvantages: it requires a complete repo fetch every run, even > if we don't need to do anything because nothing has changed, and it also > means we can't report the version numbers on files changed. You could also just have the windows machine rsync the directory from one of the other build machines? -- greg
Greg Stark wrote: >"Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > > > >>One thought I had was to force Windows to use CVS export rather than update. >>This has 2 disadvantages: it requires a complete repo fetch every run, even >>if we don't need to do anything because nothing has changed, and it also >>means we can't report the version numbers on files changed. >> >> > >You could also just have the windows machine rsync the directory from one of >the other build machines? > > > The farm is distributed - none of the members have any knowledge of the others. And it is a design requirement that no inbound access is required for buildfarm members, and that no tools are required other than those that are required to build postgres. Anyway, I think we have it covered now,. cheers andrew
On Jun 4, 2006, at 8:18 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > I said: > >>> >>> Another option would be to re-run cvs up one more time if we get any >>> unexpected files. It sounds like that would fix this issue on >>> windows >>> machines, while still ensuring we had a clean repo to work from. >>> >> >> please see the new release of the buildfarm client, in which I have >> followed Tom's suggestion of removing the -P flag from the >> checkout and >> update commands - that should solve the Windows problem, as it >> will no >> longer try to remove the directory. I hope that solves the problem - >> if not I'll have a look at other solutions. >> > > Unfortunately, this fell over first time out: > http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl? > nm=loris&dt=2006-06-04%2012:09:33 > The fix handled directories, but we got a false positive from a > rename not > being immediate either, it seems. Bloody Windows! > > One thought I had was to force Windows to use CVS export rather > than update. > This has 2 disadvantages: it requires a complete repo fetch every > run, even > if we don't need to do anything because nothing has changed, and it > also > means we can't report the version numbers on files changed. Example: > http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl? > nm=loris&dt=2006-06-04%2012:21:43 > So what I'm going to try instead is a variation on Jim's suggestion > above, > but instead of re-running cvs update, what we'll do is a longish > sleep (say > 10 or 20 secs) which should be enough time for Windows to get its act > together, and then run cvs status, which will also show us > extraneous files. What about my suggestion of runing CVS a second time if we get extraneous files the first go-round? I'm guessing there'd have to be a sleep in there as well... -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
Jim Nasby wrote: > > What about my suggestion of runing CVS a second time if we get > extraneous files the first go-round? I'm guessing there'd have to be a > sleep in there as well... The trouble with running "cvs update" a second time is that it will be just as liable to fail as the first run. So I am following your suggestion, but with this modification: after a sleep we will run "cvs status" which will not have the same issues, because it doesn't create or delete anything, and will show us any extraneous files/directories that might be present. cheers andrew