Re: 'CVS-Unknown' buildfarm failures?
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 'CVS-Unknown' buildfarm failures? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | B7CB5762-6EB5-470D-BECE-5013E7736588@pervasive.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 'CVS-Unknown' buildfarm failures? (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: 'CVS-Unknown' buildfarm failures?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Jun 2, 2006, at 10:27 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > Joshua D. Drake wrote: >> Tom Lane wrote: >>> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: >>>> What's happening here is that cvs actually creates the directory >>>> and then later prunes it when it finds it is empty. >>> >>> I find that explanation pretty unconvincing. Why would cvs print >>> a "?" >>> for such a directory? >> >> cvs will print a ? if it doesn't know what it is... or is that svn? >> > > yes, it's a file/directory it doesn't know about. > > At one stage I suppressed these checks, but I found that too many > times we saw errors due to unclean repos. So now buildfarm insists > on having a clean repo. > > I suppose I could provide a switch to turn it off ... in one recent > case the repo was genuinely not clean, though, so I am not terribly > keen on that approach - but I am open to persuasion. Another option would be to re-run cvs up one more time if we get any unexpected files. It sounds like that would fix this issue on windows machines, while still ensuring we had a clean repo to work from.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: