Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: psql -l)
От | teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød) |
---|---|
Тема | Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: psql -l) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | xuyzo9zchkc.fsf@halden.devel.redhat.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: psql -l) (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > On Friday 20 July 2001 11:25, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > I am slightly concerned about bloating our CVS tree. > > The RPM additions are: > > 56 contrib-intarray.tar.gz > > 4 file-lists.tar.gz > > 180 jdbc7.0-1.1.jar > > 92 jdbc7.1-1.2.jar > > 8 migration-scripts.tar.gz > > 4 postgresql-7.1.plperl.patch > > 4 postgresql-7.1.s390x.patch > > 4 postgresql-bashprofile > > 4 postgresql-dump.1.gz > > 8 postgresql.init > > 20 README.rpm-dist > > 4 rh-pgdump.sh > > 8 rpm-pgsql-7.1.patch > > > > Of which the two jar files are derived from the source and wouldn't be > > necessary. This totals 124K if I've done my math right. > > Bag the JAR's and it looks fine. > > > The contrib-intarray.tar.gz is a new intarray from Red Hat -- I really need > > to investigate this more closely.... > > Can you research that? Why are they doing it? It's a new one from upstream - it fixed some bugs, AFAIK. -- Trond Eivind Glomsrød Red Hat, Inc.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: