Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: psql -l)
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: psql -l) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200107201603.f6KG31V16164@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: psql -l) (Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: psql -l)
|
Список | pgsql-general |
> On Friday 20 July 2001 11:25, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > I am slightly concerned about bloating our CVS tree. > The RPM additions are: > 56 contrib-intarray.tar.gz > 4 file-lists.tar.gz > 180 jdbc7.0-1.1.jar > 92 jdbc7.1-1.2.jar > 8 migration-scripts.tar.gz > 4 postgresql-7.1.plperl.patch > 4 postgresql-7.1.s390x.patch > 4 postgresql-bashprofile > 4 postgresql-dump.1.gz > 8 postgresql.init > 20 README.rpm-dist > 4 rh-pgdump.sh > 8 rpm-pgsql-7.1.patch > > Of which the two jar files are derived from the source and wouldn't be > necessary. This totals 124K if I've done my math right. Bag the JAR's and it looks fine. > The contrib-intarray.tar.gz is a new intarray from Red Hat -- I really need > to investigate this more closely.... Can you research that? Why are they doing it? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: