Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone
От | teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød) |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone |
Дата | |
Msg-id | xuywvbfxn7g.fsf@halden.devel.redhat.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone (Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org> writes: > Oliver Elphick wrote: > > No, UNIX sockets are specifically mentioned as belonging under /var/run. > > In section 5.10 "/var/run : Run-time variable data", it says: "Programs > > that maintain transient UNIX-domain sockets should place them in this > > directory." > > > > So what ever the outcome for the wider PostgreSQL community, I must make > > the change to conform to Debian policy. > > So, if PostgreSQL is a part of Debian, then there will be problems if > the client-server situation isn't somehow fixed to allow robust > location-independent socket finding. > > Looks like the same thing is going to happen with RedHat's > distribution. So, if this is going to occur, let's get a consensus as > to where that alternate location (barring some other solution) is going > to be, so that there are the fewest variants out there. FHS is a good starting (and end-) point. -- Trond Eivind Glomsrød Red Hat, Inc.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: