Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone
От | Lamar Owen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3A74A8F3.987EEA25@wgcr.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone ("Oliver Elphick" <olly@lfix.co.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Oliver Elphick wrote: > No, UNIX sockets are specifically mentioned as belonging under /var/run. > In section 5.10 "/var/run : Run-time variable data", it says: "Programs > that maintain transient UNIX-domain sockets should place them in this > directory." > > So what ever the outcome for the wider PostgreSQL community, I must make > the change to conform to Debian policy. So, if PostgreSQL is a part of Debian, then there will be problems if the client-server situation isn't somehow fixed to allow robust location-independent socket finding. Looks like the same thing is going to happen with RedHat's distribution. So, if this is going to occur, let's get a consensus as to where that alternate location (barring some other solution) is going to be, so that there are the fewest variants out there. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: