Re: XFS File systems and PostgreSQL
От | Doug McNaught |
---|---|
Тема | Re: XFS File systems and PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | m3vgnjl3it.fsf@belphigor.mcnaught.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | XFS File systems and PostgreSQL (bruc@stone.congenomics.com (Robert E. Bruccoleri)) |
Ответы |
Re: XFS File systems and PostgreSQL
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
bruc@stone.congenomics.com (Robert E. Bruccoleri) writes: > I have been using PostgreSQL and XFS file systems on SGI's for many > years, and PostgreSQL is fast. Dumping and loading 100GB of table > files takes less than one day elapsed (provided there is no other > activity on that database -- large amounts of transactional activity > will slow things down). I always turn off fsync. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Then your performance numbers are largely useless for those of us that like our data. ;) The point at issue is the performance of fsync() on journaling filesystems... -Doug -- The rain man gave me two cures; he said jump right in, The first was Texas medicine--the second was just railroad gin, And like a fool I mixed them, and it strangled up my mind, Now people just get uglier, and I got no sense of time... --Dylan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: