Re: XFS File systems and PostgreSQL
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: XFS File systems and PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200105030019.f430JNh02117@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: XFS File systems and PostgreSQL (Doug McNaught <doug@wireboard.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: XFS File systems and PostgreSQL
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> bruc@stone.congenomics.com (Robert E. Bruccoleri) writes: > > > I have been using PostgreSQL and XFS file systems on SGI's for many > > years, and PostgreSQL is fast. Dumping and loading 100GB of table > > files takes less than one day elapsed (provided there is no other > > activity on that database -- large amounts of transactional activity > > will slow things down). I always turn off fsync. > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > Then your performance numbers are largely useless for those of us that > like our data. ;) > > The point at issue is the performance of fsync() on journaling > filesystems... Yes, the irony is that a journaling file system is being used to have fast, reliable restore after crash bootup, but with no fsync, the db is probably hosed. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: