Re: Why PostgreSQL is not that popular as MySQL?
| От | Ronald Cole |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Why PostgreSQL is not that popular as MySQL? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | m3pujefeba.fsf@yakisoba.forte-intl.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответы |
Re: Re: Why PostgreSQL is not that popular as MySQL?
Re: Re: Why PostgreSQL is not that popular as MySQL? |
| Список | pgsql-general |
Raymond Chui <raymond.chui@noaa.gov> writes: > I am just start look at PostgreSQL for our Redhat Linux. > I am wonder why most of people choose MySQL in Linux > world rather than PostgreSQL? PostgreSQL has 15 years > history (I never know that before) which is much longer > than MySQL. Also PostgreSQL supports a lot of things > which MySQL has not support yet. Postgres, yes. PostgreSQL, no. PostgreSQL was a new project with Postgres95 as a starting point. Postgres95 was an attempt to put an SQL front-end on Postgres. AFAIK, most all of the Postgres code was jettisoned early on for performance reasons. That makes PostgreSQL roughly five years old, code-wise. I still have a Postgres95 tree in CVS before the PostgreSQL fork to prove it, too! ;) -- Forte International, P.O. Box 1412, Ridgecrest, CA 93556-1412 Ronald Cole <ronald@forte-intl.com> Phone: (760) 499-9142 President, CEO Fax: (760) 499-9152 My GPG fingerprint: C3AF 4BE9 BEA6 F1C2 B084 4A88 8851 E6C8 69E3 B00B
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: