Re: Re: Why PostgreSQL is not that popular as MySQL?
От | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: Why PostgreSQL is not that popular as MySQL? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.21.0012041605470.1558-100000@thelab.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Why PostgreSQL is not that popular as MySQL? (Ronald Cole <ronald@forte-intl.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 29 Nov 2000, Ronald Cole wrote: > Raymond Chui <raymond.chui@noaa.gov> writes: > > I am just start look at PostgreSQL for our Redhat Linux. > > I am wonder why most of people choose MySQL in Linux > > world rather than PostgreSQL? PostgreSQL has 15 years > > history (I never know that before) which is much longer > > than MySQL. Also PostgreSQL supports a lot of things > > which MySQL has not support yet. > > Postgres, yes. PostgreSQL, no. PostgreSQL was a new project with > Postgres95 as a starting point. Postgres95 was an attempt to put an > SQL front-end on Postgres. AFAIK, most all of the Postgres code was > jettisoned early on for performance reasons. That makes PostgreSQL > roughly five years old, code-wise. > > I still have a Postgres95 tree in CVS before the PostgreSQL fork to > prove it, too! ;) so do we :) way way back when: RCS file: /home/projects/pgsql/cvsroot/pgsql/HISTORY,v Working file: HISTORY head: 1.79 branch: locks: strict access list: symbolic names: REL7_0_PATCHES: 1.70.0.2 REL7_0: 1.70 REL6_5_PATCHES: 1.52.0.2 REL6_5: 1.52 REL6_4: 1.44.0.2 release-6-3: 1.33 SUPPORT: 1.1.1.1 PG95-DIST: 1.1.1 --------------- Postgres95 1.02 Thu Aug 1 18:00:00 EDT 1996 ------------------------------------------------------------- Source code maintainenance and development * worldwide team of volunteers * the source tree now in CVS at ftp.ki.net * developers mailing list - pg95-dev@ki.net --------------- yeesh ... now *that* is old ... 4.5 years and growing ...
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: