Re: 4 billion record limit?
От | kumar1@home.com (Prasanth A. Kumar) |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 4 billion record limit? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | m3og3kmefw.fsf@C654771-a.frmt1.sfba.home.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | 4 billion record limit? (Paul Caskey <paul@nmxs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: 4 billion record limit?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
brad <brad@kieser.net> writes: <snip> > Simply waiting for 64bit numbers is rather inelegant and also presumes usage > parameters for the database... remember Bill Gates saying that he couldn't > foresee any usage for more than 64MB of RAM? Besides which, PostgreSQL is the > best DB around... there's a high standard to maintain! <snip> Actually, he was purported to have said that nobody would need more that 640KB or ram, which was the limit of memory on MSDOS. Brings back memories... remember having to juggle the drivers on bootup to plays that game which wanted nearly all of the base memory but you still needed the mouse, soundcard and cdrom access? ;-) -- Prasanth Kumar kumar1@home.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: