Re: 4 billion record limit?
От | Bradley Kieser |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 4 billion record limit? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E13HkXo-0001Je-00@kieser.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 4 billion record limit? (kumar1@home.com (Prasanth A. Kumar)) |
Ответы |
RE: 4 billion record limit?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
My mistake! ;-) I remember wondering who would ever need more that the 16K that the Sinclair Spectrum could give you! Quoting "Prasanth A. Kumar" <kumar1@home.com>: > brad <brad@kieser.net> writes: > > <snip> > > Simply waiting for 64bit numbers is rather inelegant and also presumes > usage > > parameters for the database... remember Bill Gates saying that he > couldn't > > foresee any usage for more than 64MB of RAM? Besides which, PostgreSQL is > the > > best DB around... there's a high standard to maintain! > <snip> > > Actually, he was purported to have said that nobody would need more > that 640KB or ram, which was the limit of memory on MSDOS. Brings back > memories... remember having to juggle the drivers on bootup to plays > that game which wanted nearly all of the base memory but you still > needed the mouse, soundcard and cdrom access? ;-) > > -- > Prasanth Kumar > kumar1@home.com > Bradley Kieser Director Kieser.net
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: