Re: Changing behavior of BEGIN...sleep...do something...COMMIT
От | Doug McNaught |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Changing behavior of BEGIN...sleep...do something...COMMIT |
Дата | |
Msg-id | m3k7ehvj0b.fsf@varsoon.wireboard.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Changing behavior of BEGIN...sleep...do something...COMMIT (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Changing behavior of BEGIN...sleep...do something...COMMIT
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > Accordingly, it's a bad idea to invent now('clock') and make it the > same function as the other flavors. We could get away with making > now('transaction') and now('statement') ---- but the argument for this > was consistency, and that argument pretty much falls flat if those two > are one function while clock time is something else. > > So I'm back in the camp of thinking three separate parameterless > functions are the way to do it. We already know what now() does, > and we're not going to change it --- anyone want to propose names > for the other two? Maybe clock_time() and statement_time(), with transaction_time() an alias for now() (if that's seemed necessary)? A little verbose perhaps, but clear... -Doug
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: