Re: Changing behavior of BEGIN...sleep...do something...COMMIT
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Changing behavior of BEGIN...sleep...do something...COMMIT |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200303291656.h2TGu7k20680@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Changing behavior of BEGIN...sleep...do something...COMMIT (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl>) |
Ответы |
Re: Changing behavior of BEGIN...sleep...do something...COMMIT
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 11:13:28PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > > The other thing that could be thought about here is when to freeze the > > value of now(). Currently now() is frozen when BEGIN is received. > > We could keep doing that, but it seems to me it would make more sense > > to freeze now() when the transaction snapshot is established. In a > > very real sense, the transaction snapshot defines "when the transaction > > starts" --- so shouldn't now() agree? > > Yes, I saw this in the code and wondered about the inconsistency. I > agree the timestamp should be taken at the same time as the snapshot. > > While at this, what do you think about adding the necessary variables > to make now('transaction') and now('query') possible? TODO already has: * Add now("transaction|statement|clock") functionality -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: