Re: PostgreSQL vs MySQL
От | Christopher Browne |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL vs MySQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | m37jv15h2a.fsf@wolfe.cbbrowne.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL vs MySQL (Dan Langille <dan@langille.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL vs MySQL
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
In an attempt to throw the authorities off his trail, threshar@torgo.978.org (Jeff) transmitted: > One area though is fast recovery - Reloading a multi-GB db from a > pg_dump is painful, especially if you have foreign keys. Lots of > sort_mem helps. A very interesting approach on a multi-cpu system would be to restore multiple indices concurrently when working on a single table. The locality of reference should allow this to be handled quite efficiently, as data blocks pulled in for one index should shortly be used for others. This ought to get decent parallelism. -- wm(X,Y):-write(X),write('@'),write(Y). wm('cbbrowne','cbbrowne.com'). http://www3.sympatico.ca/cbbrowne/linuxdistributions.html "To conquer the enemy without resorting to war is the most desirable. The highest form of generalship is to conquer the enemy by strategy." -- Sun Tzu, "The Art of War"
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: