Re: PostgreSQL vs MySQL
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL vs MySQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20040525135440.GD2362@dcc.uchile.cl обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL vs MySQL (Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL vs MySQL
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 11:19:57PM -0400, Christopher Browne wrote: > In an attempt to throw the authorities off his trail, threshar@torgo.978.org (Jeff) transmitted: > > One area though is fast recovery - Reloading a multi-GB db from a > > pg_dump is painful, especially if you have foreign keys. Lots of > > sort_mem helps. > > A very interesting approach on a multi-cpu system would be to restore > multiple indices concurrently when working on a single table. The > locality of reference should allow this to be handled quite > efficiently, as data blocks pulled in for one index should shortly be > used for others. I'm not sure this would give actual additional performance though, because (btree-) index creation appears to be slowed down by excessive unnecessary WAL traffic. I'm sure this can be handled better; Tom Lane made noises about correcting it, but who knows if it will make 7.5 ... -- Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>) "La gente vulgar solo piensa en pasar el tiempo; el que tiene talento, en aprovecharlo"
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: