Re: EXPLAIN, utility statement parameters, and recent plpgsql changes
От | Dimitri Fontaine |
---|---|
Тема | Re: EXPLAIN, utility statement parameters, and recent plpgsql changes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | m2tyuoxwy2.fsf@hi-media.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: EXPLAIN, utility statement parameters, and recent plpgsql changes (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: EXPLAIN, utility statement parameters, and recent plpgsql changes
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com> writes: >> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: >>> This works well enough for regular DML statements, but it falls down for >>> EXPLAIN which is a utility statement, because *parse analysis of utility >>> statements doesn't do anything*. EXPLAIN actually does the parse >>> analysis of its contained statement at the beginning of execution. >>> And that is too late, in the scenario Pavel exhibited. Why is it too >>> late? Because SPI_cursor_open_internal() intentionally "freezes" the >>> ParamListInfo struct after doing initial parsing: what it copies into >>> the cursor portal is just a static list of data values without the >>> parser hooks (see copyParamList). > >> Would it make any sense for this function to get to call the hook in the >> case a utility statement is being processed? > > Well, the point of the hook is to change the results of parse > transformation, so just calling it doesn't do much --- you have to apply > the whole parse analysis process, *and keep the resulting tree*. Could that be done in the function, in the phase you call "doing initial parsing"? -- dim
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: