Re: EXPLAIN, utility statement parameters, and recent plpgsql changes
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: EXPLAIN, utility statement parameters, and recent plpgsql changes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 27812.1263497961@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: EXPLAIN, utility statement parameters, and recent plpgsql changes (Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: EXPLAIN, utility statement parameters, and recent plpgsql changes
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com> writes: > Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: >> This works well enough for regular DML statements, but it falls down for >> EXPLAIN which is a utility statement, because *parse analysis of utility >> statements doesn't do anything*. EXPLAIN actually does the parse >> analysis of its contained statement at the beginning of execution. >> And that is too late, in the scenario Pavel exhibited. Why is it too >> late? Because SPI_cursor_open_internal() intentionally "freezes" the >> ParamListInfo struct after doing initial parsing: what it copies into >> the cursor portal is just a static list of data values without the >> parser hooks (see copyParamList). > Would it make any sense for this function to get to call the hook in the > case a utility statement is being processed? Well, the point of the hook is to change the results of parse transformation, so just calling it doesn't do much --- you have to apply the whole parse analysis process, *and keep the resulting tree*. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: