Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ?

Tom Lane wrote:

> We have to be pretty careful with these back-rev patches, since they
> typically aren't going to get much testing in the back version's
> CVS tree.  So I'm leery of applying anything that hasn't been tested
> for a while in the development branch.

    Over  careful!  They  might  rely on new features that aren't
    there.  So it's better to wait for a v6.4.* based bug  report
    and fix them by hand instead of appying complete patches that
    fix it on the fly.


Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#======================================== jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) #