Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 12773.918427868@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? (jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ?
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4.3 ? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) writes: > Don't remember what's all fixed between v6.4.2 and now. > Does anyone else know about bugs that are still in the REL6_4 > branch and could be fixed without adding features? I just checked in the ". conftest.sh" -> ". ./conftest.sh" fix to configure, which several people have complained of (6.4.2 fails if "." is not in your PATH at configure time). We have to be pretty careful with these back-rev patches, since they typically aren't going to get much testing in the back version's CVS tree. So I'm leery of applying anything that hasn't been tested for a while in the development branch. For example, the patch I just applied to CURRENT to link libpgtcl.so with -lcrypt perhaps ought to go into REL6_4 --- but I'm afraid to do that until we verify that it works on a variety of platforms. It fixes things on teo's Linux box but I worry that it might actually break things elsewhere. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: