Re: AW: [HACKERS] Solution to the pg_user passwd problem !?? (c)
| От | jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: AW: [HACKERS] Solution to the pg_user passwd problem !?? (c) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | m0y5buk-000BFRC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: AW: [HACKERS] Solution to the pg_user passwd problem !?? (c) (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: AW: [HACKERS] Solution to the pg_user passwd problem !?? (c)
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
>
> >
> > On Thu, 19 Feb 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > > Just curious, but why don't the copy command fall under the same
> > > > grant/revoke restrictions in the first place? It sounds to me like we are
> > > > backing off of the problem instead of addressing it...
> > >
> > > grant/revoke works for copy.
> >
> > Ah, okay, so when we have it setup so that a view overrides the
> > 'grant' of a select, then we're fine?
>
> Yep, but can we do that in nine days, and be sure it is tested?
Don't think so - not really hard tested.
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian
> maillist@candle.pha.pa.us
>
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#======================================== jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) #
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: