Re: AW: [HACKERS] Solution to the pg_user passwd problem !?? (c)
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: AW: [HACKERS] Solution to the pg_user passwd problem !?? (c) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199802191947.OAA11984@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: AW: [HACKERS] Solution to the pg_user passwd problem !?? (c) (jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)) |
Ответы |
Re: AW: [HACKERS] Solution to the pg_user passwd problem !?? (c)
Re: AW: [HACKERS] Solution to the pg_user passwd problem !?? (c) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > > > > > > > > On Thu, 19 Feb 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > > > > Just curious, but why don't the copy command fall under the same > > > > > grant/revoke restrictions in the first place? It sounds to me like we are > > > > > backing off of the problem instead of addressing it... > > > > > > > > grant/revoke works for copy. > > > > > > Ah, okay, so when we have it setup so that a view overrides the > > > 'grant' of a select, then we're fine? > > > > Yep, but can we do that in nine days, and be sure it is tested? > > Don't think so - not really hard tested. If you think you can get it in with light testing by the beta people, Marc might bite on it. -- Bruce Momjian maillist@candle.pha.pa.us
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: