Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs

On 2/14/19 8:22 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 10:02 AM Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 2019-Feb-14, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>
>>> On 14/02/2019 16:11, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> ... so, have we beaten this topic to death yet?  Can we make a decision?
>>>>
>>>> Personally, I'd be happy with either of the last two patch versions
>>>> I posted (that is, either AS [[NOT] MATERIALIZED] or
>>>> AS [MATERIALIZE [ON|OFF]] syntax).  But we gotta pick something.
>>>
>>> If we're not really planning to add any more options, I'd register a
>>> light vote for MATERIALIZED.  It reads easier, seems more grammatically
>>> correct, and uses an existing word.
>>
>> +1 for MATERIALIZED, as I proposed in
>> https://postgr.es/m/20170503173305.fetj4tz7kd56tjlr@alvherre.pgsql
> 
> Seconded!
> 

+1 to MATERIALIZED too

regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services