Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 31353.1550351689@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs
Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On 2/14/19 8:22 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 10:02 AM Alvaro Herrera >> <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >>> On 2019-Feb-14, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >>>> If we're not really planning to add any more options, I'd register a >>>> light vote for MATERIALIZED. It reads easier, seems more grammatically >>>> correct, and uses an existing word. >>> +1 for MATERIALIZED, as I proposed in >>> https://postgr.es/m/20170503173305.fetj4tz7kd56tjlr@alvherre.pgsql >> Seconded! > +1 to MATERIALIZED too I was expecting more controversy ... pushed that way. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: