Re: Changing work_mem
От | rihad |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Changing work_mem |
Дата | |
Msg-id | fcc30166-08a4-5be3-0ef6-40c192e5c5e2@mail.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Changing work_mem (rihad <rihad@mail.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: Changing work_mem
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 08/13/2019 09:04 PM, rihad wrote: > On 08/13/2019 08:44 PM, rihad wrote: >> On 08/13/2019 08:22 PM, Luca Ferrari wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 5:59 PM rihad <rihad@mail.ru> wrote: >>>> [dbname] LOG: temporary file: path >>>> "base/pgsql_tmp/pgsql_tmp93683.257381", size 594 >>>> >>> The setting 'work_mem' is within context 'user', that means it will >>> affect running sessione unless the session itself has already issued a >>> SET work_mem to xxx. >>> So this could be a reason why you don't seem to see any change. >>> >>> Also keep in mind that work_mem work on a connection basis, so you are >>> going to possibly see 521MB x num_connections if all your clients are >>> doig the same kind of sort concurrently, which probably causes >>> PostgreSQL to go to disk due to memory unavailable. >>> >>> Hope this helps. >>> Luca >>> . >>> >> Thanks. The box has 15GB mem free (as in FreeBSD ))) >> >> And it hasn't moved a notch after the increase. >> >> No code does SET work_mem=... AFAIK. >> >> My apologies to Mr. Peter but I still think that older processes, >> some of them started a couple of weeks ago, use the older setting. > Sorry, I just decreased work_mem back to 256MB, reloaded, and > instantly started seeing 82mb temp file creation, not 165mb as was > usual with work_mem=512MB. > > So it indeed was applied immediately. > Really weird figures ) Increased work_mem to 768MB and start seeing temp file creation log entries 331MB in size. Bizzare ) It looks like the bigger it gets, the bigger temp files are created. Why not decrease it to 64mb then...
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: