Re: Changing work_mem
От | rihad |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Changing work_mem |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9c6b069a-c99b-4b65-92fa-59404012e576@mail.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Changing work_mem (rihad <rihad@mail.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: Changing work_mem
Re: Changing work_mem |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 08/13/2019 08:44 PM, rihad wrote: > On 08/13/2019 08:22 PM, Luca Ferrari wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 5:59 PM rihad <rihad@mail.ru> wrote: >>> [dbname] LOG: temporary file: path >>> "base/pgsql_tmp/pgsql_tmp93683.257381", size 594 >>> >> The setting 'work_mem' is within context 'user', that means it will >> affect running sessione unless the session itself has already issued a >> SET work_mem to xxx. >> So this could be a reason why you don't seem to see any change. >> >> Also keep in mind that work_mem work on a connection basis, so you are >> going to possibly see 521MB x num_connections if all your clients are >> doig the same kind of sort concurrently, which probably causes >> PostgreSQL to go to disk due to memory unavailable. >> >> Hope this helps. >> Luca >> . >> > Thanks. The box has 15GB mem free (as in FreeBSD ))) > > And it hasn't moved a notch after the increase. > > No code does SET work_mem=... AFAIK. > > My apologies to Mr. Peter but I still think that older processes, some > of them started a couple of weeks ago, use the older setting. Sorry, I just decreased work_mem back to 256MB, reloaded, and instantly started seeing 82mb temp file creation, not 165mb as was usual with work_mem=512MB. So it indeed was applied immediately. Really weird figures )
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: