Re: Barman versus pgBackRest
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Barman versus pgBackRest |
Дата | |
Msg-id | f84c6da0-0701-a432-ca7a-fa2f71c3c7c0@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Barman versus pgBackRest (Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Barman versus pgBackRest
Re: Barman versus pgBackRest |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 09/04/2018 07:52 AM, Ron wrote: > On 09/04/2018 09:24 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: >> On 09/04/2018 07:14 AM, Ron wrote: >>> >>> That was about barman, in the barman group. This is asking about >>> pgbackrest... :) >>> >>> So: does pgbackrest have this ability which barman does not have? >>> The "--db-include" option seems to indicate that you can restore a >>> single db, but does indicate whether or not you can rename it. >> >> https://pgbackrest.org/configuration.html#section-restore/option-db-include >> >> > > Which implies that you can't do it? You can restore a single database and then issue a simple ALTER DATABASE command to change the DB name. > > (Postgres backup/restore capabilities are quite limited, which is > disapointing.) Not sure I agree with that. If you want to restore and then rename a DB, rename it. ALTER DATABASE foo RENAME TO bar; JD -- Command Prompt, Inc. || http://the.postgres.company/ || @cmdpromptinc *** A fault and talent of mine is to tell it exactly how it is. *** PostgreSQL centered full stack support, consulting and development. Advocate: @amplifypostgres || Learn: https://postgresconf.org ***** Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own. *****
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: