Re: Barman versus pgBackRest

On 09/04/2018 10:24 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On 09/04/2018 07:52 AM, Ron wrote:
>> On 09/04/2018 09:24 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>> On 09/04/2018 07:14 AM, Ron wrote:
>>>>
>>>> That was about barman, in the barman group.  This is asking about 
>>>> pgbackrest...  :)
>>>>
>>>> So: does pgbackrest have this ability which barman does not have? The 
>>>> "--db-include" option seems to indicate that you can restore a single 
>>>> db, but does indicate whether or not you can rename it.
>>>
>>> https://pgbackrest.org/configuration.html#section-restore/option-db-include
>>>
>>
>> Which implies that you can't do it?
>
> You can restore a single database and then issue a simple ALTER DATABASE 
> command to change the DB name.
>
>>
>> (Postgres backup/restore capabilities are quite limited, which is 
>> disapointing.)
>
> Not sure I agree with that. If you want to restore and then rename a DB, 
> rename it.
>
> ALTER DATABASE foo RENAME TO bar;

But restoring an old "foo" overwrites the existing "foo".  On SQL Server 
databases, we occasionally need to restore an old foo backup "foo_old" along 
side production foo.


-- 
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.