Re: Commitfest app vs. pgsql-docs
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Commitfest app vs. pgsql-docs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | f5864479-9308-729e-b4b2-a405d797e7fd@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Commitfest app vs. pgsql-docs (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Commitfest app vs. pgsql-docs
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 5/19/21 3:07 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 7:39 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes: >>> * Laurenz Albe (laurenz.albe@cybertec.at) wrote: >>>> Since we have a "documentation" section in the commitfest, it would >>>> be useful to allow links to the -docs archives. >>> ... or get rid of the pgsql-docs mailing list, as has been suggested >>> before. >> IIRC, the CF app also rejects threads on pgsql-bugs, which is even >> more pointlessly annoying. Couldn't we just remove that restriction >> altogether, and allow anything posted to some pgsql list? > It's not technically rejecting anything, it's just explicitly looking > in -hackers and doesn't even know the others exist :) > > Changing that to look globally can certainly be done. It takes a bit > of work I think, as there are no API endpoints today that will do > that, but those could be added. > > But just to be clear -- "some pgsql list" would include things like > pgsql-general, the pgadmin lists, the non-english regional lists, etc. > That may be fine, I just want to be sure everybody realizes that's > what it means. Basically everything on > https://www.postgresql.org/list/ > It's just a reference after all. So someone supplies a reference to an email on an out of the way list. What's the evil that will occur? Not much really AFAICT. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: