Re: Commitfest app vs. pgsql-docs
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Commitfest app vs. pgsql-docs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CABUevEy-9QVEkx5Gr5mtBX8Uqmp-MGqv3TvCYZX3gjp8mToTTw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Commitfest app vs. pgsql-docs (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Commitfest app vs. pgsql-docs
Re: Commitfest app vs. pgsql-docs |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 7:39 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes: > > * Laurenz Albe (laurenz.albe@cybertec.at) wrote: > >> Since we have a "documentation" section in the commitfest, it would > >> be useful to allow links to the -docs archives. > > > ... or get rid of the pgsql-docs mailing list, as has been suggested > > before. > > IIRC, the CF app also rejects threads on pgsql-bugs, which is even > more pointlessly annoying. Couldn't we just remove that restriction > altogether, and allow anything posted to some pgsql list? It's not technically rejecting anything, it's just explicitly looking in -hackers and doesn't even know the others exist :) Changing that to look globally can certainly be done. It takes a bit of work I think, as there are no API endpoints today that will do that, but those could be added. But just to be clear -- "some pgsql list" would include things like pgsql-general, the pgadmin lists, the non-english regional lists, etc. That may be fine, I just want to be sure everybody realizes that's what it means. Basically everything on https://www.postgresql.org/list/ -- Magnus Hagander Me: https://www.hagander.net/ Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: