Re: Future Non-server Windows support???
| От | Adrian Klaver |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Future Non-server Windows support??? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | f325e759-78d0-dae3-5823-08e33dd84ade@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Future Non-server Windows support??? (Bill Haught <wlhaught4754323@att.net>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
On 3/7/19 12:58 PM, Bill Haught wrote: > On 3/7/2019 8:29 PM, Thomas Kellerer wrote: >> Bill Haught schrieb am 07.03.2019 um 20:41: >>> "...most Windows 95 applications still run fine in Windows 10 - >>> that's 20 years of binary compatibility" See Major Linux Problems on >>> the Desktop, 2018 edition by Artem S. Tashkinov >>> https://itvision.altervista.org/why.linux.is.not.ready.for.the.desktop.current.html >>> >>> >>> I really wish Linux or Linux plus Darling was a real alternative to >>> Winblows. >> >> On the server, Linux definitely *is* a real alternative to Windows >> >> >> My 0.02€ >> >> Thomas >> >> >> >> > > In the case of servers, I thought it was the other way around. Last I > heard they were neck-and-neck after Linux being overwhelmingly in the > lead for at least something like the first decade of the (at least > "public") Internet. See: https://www.zdnet.com/article/linux-now-dominates-azure/ > > Like why would anyone choose Winbloz *if* you don't *have* too, I have > no idea. > > > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: